European ‘Good Riddance’ Tour

George W. Bush’s weeklong trip through Europe wasn’t only about glamorous dinners and leisurely jaunts to old school castles. The President’s so-called “farewell tour” was a ploy for him to take one last stab at rounding up an entourage for our impending squirmish with Iran.

Thus far, this last ditch attempt to convert “the unwilling” into fellow warmongers has come up short, akin to the Hail Mary that gets batted down behind the line of scrimmage; an air ball at the buzzer, heaved from half court. As ticking clocks eat away at the President’s dwindling relevance, his eleventh hour gives no indication that he learned much in the first ten.Whether he’s ready to accept it or not, the rest of the planet is over George W. Bush and his coalitions.

Maybe it’s that “fool me once/fool me twice” phenomenon that Bush never quite wrapped his head around.

At Wednesday’s joint press conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, our Commander-in-chief busted out two vintage Bush Doctrine tactics that unfortunately have defined American foreign policy for almost a decade:

  1. The rules he applies to others do not apply to him.
  2. Anything he says in front of a TV camera very well could be a lie.

After Bush finished bashing Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for allegedly shrugging off UN sanctions, Bush was asked to comment on reports that Iraqis were hoping for a “dramatic reduction” in the presence of U.S. troops.

Bush replied:

“You know, it’s all kinds of noise in their system and our system. What eventually will win out is the truth… We’re there at the invitation of the sovereign government of Iraq. And I strongly support the agreement because I think it helps send a clear message to the people of Iraq that, you know, that security you’re now seeing will continue. And one of the lessons of Iraq is, is that in order for a democracy to develop or in order for an economy to develop, there has to be a measure of security, which is now happening. So I think we’ll get the agreement done… You know, as to — look, Eggen, you can find any voice you want in the Iraqi political scene and quote them, which is interesting, isn’t it, because in the past you could only find one voice, and now you can find a myriad of voices. It’s a vibrant democracy; people are debating. There’s all kinds of press in the Iraqi scene, of course to the benefit of the Iraqi society. And I deal with Prime Minister Maliki. He appreciates our presence there, and he understands that we’re returning on success; as the situation merits, and the situation improves, we’re bringing our troops home. And I’m pleased with the progress. I don’t know whether or not it’s — the progress has made it here to Germany or not yet, but the progress in Iraq is substantial, and it’s going to help change the Middle East for the better. And I love the idea of having — giving people a chance to live in a free society. The blessings of freedom are — shouldn’t be just a regional blessing; I believe freedom is universal and I believe freedom yields peace.”

Sounds wonderful. Except shortly afterward Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki indicated he may ask U.S. troops to go home when their U.N. mandate to be in Iraq expires at the end of the year.

Now wouldn’t that just fuck everything up?

Maliki announced that his negotiations with U.S. diplomats “reached an impasse” because American negotiators wanted him to sign an agreement that gave the U.S. access to 58 military bases, control of Iraqi airspace and immunity from prosecution for both U.S. soldiers and private contractors. Maliki declined. In fact, while visiting Amman, Jordan, Maliki announced that, “Iraq has another option that it may use…The Iraqi government, if it wants, has the right to demand that the U.N. terminate the presence of international forces on Iraqi sovereign soil.”

Suppose Maliki does order us to leave Iraq. What might that mean if we take seriously statements like the ones Bush made in Germany?

If, in accordance with international law, Iraq requests our timely exit from their sovereign nation, that should seal the deal, shouldn’t it? We should be out of there immediately.

Anything less would obliterate the platitudes and ideological alibis that have been utilized to justify the crimes against humanity carried out in our names. We’d have to change our reason for being there all over again.

Ignoring UN orders that we leave Iraq would further solidify Bush’s permanent reputation in history as a liar and a hypocrite—not that his legacy can get much more doomed than it already is. When countries like Iran and Iraq disobey international rules, we lobby for and/or wage wars against them. America’s purported respect for the sanctity and authority of these international agreements is so profound that our government sends its expendable working class overseas to kill and die enforcing them. If these rules are so important that they’re worth dying for, surely there must be some utility in actually following them ourselves. We should be delighted that a country like Iraq, long ruled by an “evil tyrant,” is learning what it means to free (or to want to be free). And they’re so psyched about test-drive democracy that they’re willing to Declare Independence from would-be colonizers.

What a great opportunity for us to lead by example. As a civilized country, what better way to showcase the joys and perks of democracy than to demonstrate how nations that respect each other’s sovereignty behave toward one another? Since “winning” is apparently a prerequisite for withdrawing, we could even declare “victory” before we leave. Why not? We went there to Nation-Build, and we’ve successfully created a culture that now values its autonomy enough to tell us, publicly, to get the fuck out of their country. Mission accomplished?

But our Commander-in-chief neither says what he means nor mean what he says. Consider his ramblings in Germany. The statement: “I deal with Prime Minister Maliki” is only half of a sentence. It forgets to qualify itself.The complete sentence goes something like:

“I deal with Prime Minister Maliki by telling Prime Minister Maliki what to say and think and feel and do.”


“Should Prime Minister Maliki begin putting his own country’s national interests before those of its occupier, the world will see once and for all how I deal with Prime Minister Maliki.”

George W. Bush can call it a “farewell tour” all he wants. But this week, and in the months to follow, the world is saying “good riddance.”


~ by Matthew Frederick on June 14, 2008.

11 Responses to “European ‘Good Riddance’ Tour”

  1. 218 more days of the Rectum-In-Chief


    Have you heard that he ‘may’ convert to Catholicism?


    That KABOOM! you hear is the sound of Baptist fundie heads exploding.

  2. this might be his farewell tour of the grand capitals —- but the damage this complete piece of shit can do in the next 200+ days is enormous —-

    my gut tells me that if the iraqis reject this “agreement” — somehow maliki will be replaced with someone who will make the iraqis agree – or maliki will relent. there is NO way on earth bush will willingly let his “greatest triumph” go down in a fizzle by having america kicked out while under his watch.

    nothing can save his reputation or legacy —- although he hasnt figured that out yet.

    the damage this man has managed to do in 8 years cannot be undone in 80.

  3. yeah…. then there’s that part where sovereign Iraq screws up the Republican NEOCON Plan even more by asking America to “please leave”.


  4. I think kicking us out of Iraq is the one thing Maliki can do in order to hold onto power. He’ll get so much respect from the myriad factions in Iraq that the country might actually rally around him and get their act together. It might only last a month, but it’s something.

  5. This has gone past the point of utter retardation. I have to agree with DCap (for what it’s worth) I don’t see Bush letting this one go. Hes fucking obsessed with this shit.

  6. LOL u make him sound like the rolling stones LOL

  7. You nailed it with this post. Bush is a liar and a hypocrite. He says all kind of stupid shit to appease, oh I don’t know, people who care I guess, but then he does what he wants to do regardless of whether it is right or wrong, justified or not. But that’s been our governmental system for a long time now isn’t it?–our government serves multinational corporate interests such as big oil or big pharma and we can go die on the battlefield swallowing the koolaid that we are over in another foreign country for freedom and democracy but really our troops are over there to enforce corporate deals for the wealthy.

  8. For what it’s worth, I’m betting the Iraqis DO say “leave.” Then what happens? More clusterfuckness. The time window for the UN reauthorization is the end of the year. 20 days for stupidity to ensue until Inauguration.

  9. we aint secure now
    and we sure as heck dont have any liberty it seems

  10. So much anger and hate… whatever happened to “open-mindedness” and “tolerance” for those who are different from you? Does that only apply to skin color, or is there a good reason it doesn’t extend to those who differ ideologically from you?

  11. You should probably look up the word “tolerance” because you apparently don’t know what it means.

    I “tolerate” beets, but I hate the mother fuckers, and wouldn’t shed a single tear if they were taken off the market.

    Sanctimonious cunts are worse than beets.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: