CNN’s Election Hangover & Influx of Non-News

rundown-banner.jpg
new_sheep

Last night I was trying to find the latest news on Barack Obama’s cabinet appointments, when I ventured to the front page of the CNNPolitics.com, and was thoroughly annoyed at the fluffy headline they’d chosen to put atop all the others: “Is Romney the Man to Save GOP in 2012?”

This is not news now, and it might not even be news later. Something that may or may not happen in four years is not a current event. And yet, there it is, the top story at CNN.

Presidential elections in this country now span well over half the length of the sitting president’s term. The elections are barely a week behind us, and already we’re blitzed with speculation and hearsay about what’s in store for 2012. Perhaps Americans wouldn’t be so economically screwed today if, back in 2004, when the mortgage crisis was still avoidable, our citizens been less concerned about when Hillary would officially announce her future plans to run for President?

As unprofessional as our friends in the mainstream media have been, the “dumbing down” of the news is as much our fault as it is theirs. They are, after all, in the business of making money. The higher their ratings soar, the easier it is to find sponsors willing to pay to advertise during their programs. That means what we see on the so-called “news” is a function of what we most desire to see—and not a reflection of what is important. If, collectively, we were more informed, we’d be outraged over the fact that this bullshit passes as newsworthy. We’d cry out for details about Blackwater shadiness, or about the growing U.S.-Pakistan conflict. Were we an engaged citizenry, our sneaky Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson wouldn’t have gotten away with his $140 billion gift to banks, courtesy of taxpayers.

In fact, fuck it; I’m deleting CNN.com from my Mozilla bookmark icons. For too long I’ve let that network remain my “most trusted source” of Internet news every morning, the site I check when time only permits me to check one. As MSNBC leans Leftward and Fox News bends unapologetically back toward the Right, many viewers remain convinced (as I was until recently) of CNN’s fairness and neutrality. Is that because they dump on all U.S. presidential candidates equally? Of course, nearly all my early assumptions about media bias were misguided or wrong, starting with the premise that “news” should be considered “objective” and “fair” so long as it doesn’t clearly favor one major political party over the other. That might have made sense; but only if all possible worldviews and political stances were covered by one major political party or the other.

But another imbalance exists, taking the form of an apparent consensus, by all mainstream news channels, to over-report on the presidential race and under-report on everything else. That’s where the real bias lives. They do it because they’re lazy and self-absorbed; they get away with it because, so are we.  Far from being fed up with these overblown non-stories, we rather prefer to read trumped up rumors about John McCain’s mental health fluctuations or Barack Obama’s scandalous adolescent acquaintanceships—while American wars persist on multiple fronts and our economy continues to crumble.

I don’t mean to imply that election outcomes are not important. But the day-to-day gossip mill that churned out pages of useless trivia about different spats among presidential hopefuls is not (as CNN would have you assume) the most pressing news event on any given day.

ashley-dupre-spitzers-prostitute2So engrossed were we in our own insular political sideshows that it barely registered when noteworthy events occurred outside of U.S. borders. So, if you’re from one of those countries that are having a crappy decade, please pardon our outward indifference to your plight. We have no idea what’s happened in the world these last two years. We missed it all, or tried to. Eliot Spitzer’s prostitute’s sucky MySpace songs got more play than genocide in Sudan, the Cyclone Nargis, and the Sichuan Earthquake combined.

The hyping and overmarketing of presidential campaigns lets the media to ignore the crucial or controversial news stories. This is good for the media because it can refrain from reporting real-life news that might aggravate their sponsors. And while this is problematic on their part, we viewers give them an excuse by reinforcing the notion that we care more about the presidential race than we do about other important happenings in the world today. That we care more and more about the presidential rumor mill means we care less (or not at all) about whether Congress passes some obscure, buried bill that will allow domestic spying or torture. We care more about which presidential candidate’s religious affiliates offended which rich white person today.

Rather than solely condemn CNN and Fox News for the stories they choose or refuse to supply, one might blame the American citizens for our own spoiled ignorance and the information we do or do not demand.

As a result of the media’s failure to cover stories outside the soap opera, any sly scumbag with aspirations to cheat, swindle or manipulate large majorities of people knows to wait until election season to do it. Alas, perhaps that’s why the next campaign season is starting before our wet-behind-the-ear President Elect even knows who his Secretary of State is.

Still, there are some who saw and see nothing wrong with the saturation of Election ’08 coverage. They need to mull over the vibes they get from the candidates, and that requires constant surveillance. As long as we crave that overconsumption, CNN will happily pour provide it; see which comes up with the goofiest Freudian slip; inspect their medical records; condemn the drugs they did in high school; make sure the male candidates don’t act too flamboyant; make sure the women are both feminine and sufficiently masculine; evaluate their acquaintances; insist they ditch the ones we deem too rude.

It’s a tough job—being an American citizen, juggling so many pertinent subplots at once. But we’re happy to do it, because we are “the American people”, whose honorable character is exceptional in every respect. All we ask is that there are no distractions as we’re diligently scrutinizing our candidates; our mainstream media must never burden us with trivial headlines, like:

Advertisements

~ by Matthew Frederick on November 24, 2008.

7 Responses to “CNN’s Election Hangover & Influx of Non-News”

  1. Brilliant. I feel better informed since I ditched MSM sources than I ever did when I relied on CNN and MSNBC for my news. I think we have to be proactive and deliberate about informing ourselves rather than being told what we should care about.

  2. been like that it seems, they still looking for the lady lost in the islands

  3. CNN is dreadful.

    On Saturday, we got home mid-afternoon and I turned on the TV.

    1. CNN: Fredrika Whitfield(sp?) was yapping and yapping and yapping about shopping. No news. Just mindless blather.

    2. MSNBC: some sort of gruesome crime segment.

    3. FIXED Noise: to their credit, they were “talking” about Obama’s economic team — rightwing slant withstanding.

    Basically, there is no news on Saturday.

    The CNN website is a joke. Lots of stories about dogs driving cars and people seeing UFOs over Fresno. It’s like the Globe tabloid.

    I’ve long said, the only hope for CNN is if Ted Turner buys it back and fires EVERYONE including Leslie.

  4. Good post.

    FWIW, the BBC seems pretty good.

  5. Recognizing that Fox first caught CNN, which had practically 100% share in cable news, we need to give Fox credit for a great accomplishment. That MSNBC has figured out how to catch Fox and CNN is a really significant accomplishment. Understanding how each did this can help us all compete more effectively to improve sales and profits – even in a tough economy like this one.

  6. I love the BBC. If you haven’t seen “The Power of Nightmares” by Adam Curtis, I highly recommend it. It was a BBC documentary about the similarities between terrorists and the U.S. government, banned in the U.S. until 2006.

  7. “Understanding how each did this can help us all compete more effectively to improve sales and profits – even in a tough economy like this one.”

    Hartung-
    Obviously you missed the point of the post, as our goals are the exact opposite. I want to educate people, you want to manipulate them, and profit from their manipulation. If you succeed, everybody loses, including, ultimately, you. But thank you for that authentic glimpse into the soulless corporate mind. The economy is “tough” because people made dumb choices, because the media they trusted to keep them informed, reported on Lindsay Lohan’s drug habits instead.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: